| |

Judicial Affairs
Office
Nondiscrimination Policy:
A Commitment to Valuing Diversity
Excerpt
from the Student Handbook:
Preamble
Universities
have a deep obligation to value diversity among people and among ideas
and, at the same time, not to impose any specific ideology on students,
faculty, staff, or administrators. For appreciation of diversityin
nature, in human culture, and certainly in ideasis fundamental to
higher learning. The universitys enterprise is enriched when diverse
peoples are engaged in it. Beyond the profound moral value to be found
in inclusiveness, a diverse campus community characterized by free and
open communication fosters understanding of the alternative points of
view that different groups can offer.
General
Policy
It
is the policy of California State University, Fullerton, to create and
maintain an environment that values diversity, respects human dignity,
is hospitable, equitable, and tolerant, and in which all persons are free
from all forms of invidious discrimination or discriminatory harassment.
Mindful
of its high calling to promote diversity in thought and to assure all
students an appropriate learning and working environment, California State
University, Fullerton:
-
Challenges
and summons its students, faculty, staff and administration to
promote a hospitable and equitable learning environment for all
persons;
-
Asserts that
tolerance for diversity shall be the norm for behavior on the
part of all who are present on the campus;
-
Discourages
the use of derogatory or disparaging language and other forms
of expression and, particularly, condemns those who insult persons
on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, citizenship,
religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age,
disability, or veteran status.
Programmatic
Responses
To
achieve the high purpose of securing a hospitable and equitable learning
and working environment for all persons, California State University,
Fullerton commits itself to:
-
Encouraging
ethnic, gender, and cultural diversity in its faculty, student
body, staff and administration;
-
Promoting
a university curriculum that recognizes the contributions and
achievements of our diverse human community;
-
Sponsoring
programs and activities that increase the awareness of the value
of diversity.
-
Supporting
organizations that foster inter-group understanding and harmony;
-
Offering training
to faculty, staff, administrators and student leaders in promoting
harmonious inter-group interactions and conflict resolution;
-
Periodically
assessing the success of all units within the university in furthering
these goals and objectives.
While
cherishing and protecting freedoms of speech and expression that are the
very basis of the higher educational enterprise, the university will:
-
Discourage
instances of intolerance, discrimination, or harassment not subject
to sanctions under sections 2-5 below. Workshops, seminars, or
other learning opportunities focused on the nature of the bigotry
and prejudice may be appropriate responses to such behaviors;
-
Invoke, where
necessary, the sanctions authorized for instances of intentional
discrimination that are prohibited by system-wide Executive Orders
for The California State University, and/or are prohibited by
state and federal law;
-
Invoke, where
necessary, the sanctions authorized under standard civil and criminal
codes for intentionally threatening individuals, damaging property,
or disrupting the educational enterprise, specifically including
those instances of threat, damage and disruption premised on in
tolerance and discrimination;
-
Take appropriate
actions in the face of student misconduct as provided in Title
5, California Code of Regulations, including Section 41301(k)
which prohibits abusive behavior directed toward, or hazing of,
any member of the campus community;
-
Take actions
in the face of misconduct, including misconduct premised on intolerance
and discrimination, by staff and faculty as appropriate in the
context of collective bargaining agreements; and in the instance
of administrators and other employees not covered by bargaining
agreements, in the context of Executive Order 419.
Guidelines
for Establishing Campus Procedures for the Resolution of Complaints Filed
Under the Provisions of the CSU Fullerton Nondiscrimination Policy
The
procedures shall conform to the following general principles:
-
The first and
foremost principle shall be to protect constitutionally protected
speech, specifically including speech in the classroom. No prior
restraint upon expression shall be embodied in a code of conduct
or other such regulations designed to sanction invidious harassment.
-
The second principle,
and next in order of priority, shall be a preference for informal
resolution of minor conflicts and disputes. Major disputes and recurring
minor incidents of intentionally discriminatory behavior should
be addressed through formal resolution.
-
The third principle,
and next in order of priority, shall be confidentiality, but only
insofar as confidentiality may be consistent with due process.
-
The fourth principle,
and next in order of priority, shall be enforcement of the policy
and procedures in a manner consistent with due process protections,
including the right of any individual charged with violation to
notice and a hearing.
-
The fifth principle,
and last in order of priority, shall be the maintenance of records
adequate for statistical and policy review. Record keeping must
not be inconsistent with, and must not take priority over, confidentiality
and a preference for informal dispute resolution.
Effective
date: January 28, 1992
Supersedes:
ASD 91-125 (Rev)
No
previous UPS
top
Sexual
Harassment Policy
Policy
Statement
It
is the policy of California State University, Fullerton and The California
State University to maintain a working and learning environment free from
sexual harassment of its students, employees and those who apply for student
or employee status. Sexual harassment is illegal under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Higher Education Amendments
of 1972, and California Education Code Section 89535. Executive Order
345 Prohibition of Sexual Harassmentalso prohibits sexual
harassment within the California State University System. The university
will not tolerate sexual harassment and will take action to eliminate
such behavior.
Definition
and Conditions of Sexual Harassment
Sexual
advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct
of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when:
-
Submission
to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term
or condition of an individuals employment;
-
Submission
to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the
basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals.
-
Such conduct
has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an
individuals work performance or creating an intimidating,
hostile, or offensive working environment;
-
Such conduct
has the purpose or effect of interfering with a students
academic performance, creating an intimidating, hostile, offensive
or otherwise adverse learning environment, or adversely affecting
any students access to campus programs, services and benefits.
Policy
Implementation and Dissemination
The
President is responsible for the implementation of this policy, establishment
of procedures for the resolution of complaints, and preparation of periodic
status reports.
All
supervisors and managers are responsible for the implementation of this
policy and maintaining a working and learning environment free from sexual
harassment.
This
policy and a listing of offices designated to receive complaints shall
be widely disseminated to all members of the university community and
publicized in official campus publications.
Guidelines
for Establishing Campus Procedures for the Resolution of Complaints Filed
Under the Provisions of the Policy
The
procedures shall conform to the following general principles:
-
The policy
and procedures shall be enforced in a manner consistent with due
process protections, including the right of any individual charged
with a violation to notice and a hearing.
-
Confidentiality
shall be of primary importance insofar as may be consistent with
due process.
-
Informal resolution
shall be the established practice for minor conflicts and disputes.
Major disputes and recurring minor incidents of intentionally
discriminatory behavior should be addressed through formal resolution.
-
Records shall
be maintained which are adequate for statistical and policy review.
Record keeping must not be inconsistent with, and must not take
priority over, confidentiality and a preference for informal dispute
resolution.
-
Any member
of the campus community may use the procedures except as otherwise
provided for under an agreement between a collective bargaining
unit and the university. Faculty, staff and administrative employees
should refer to the appropriate collective bargaining agreement
for filing complaints of harassment or Executive Order 419, and
should contact any of these offices for assistance: Affirmative
Action, Academic Affairs, or Human Resources.
-
Students and
employees who knowingly file fraudulent complaints under this
policy and implementing procedures are subject to disciplinary
action.
-
Students and
employees will not be subject to retaliation for filing legitimate
complaints.
Effective:
June 27, 1994
Supersedes:
ASD 94-72
No
previous UPS
top
Amorous
Relationships between Faculty, Staff, and Students
Amorous
or sexual relationships between faculty or staff and a member of the university
community for whom they have teaching, evaluative, advocacy, counseling,
advising or supervisory responsibilities are unacceptable, even if the
parties involved view such a relationship as consensual.
The
university will regard such behavior as unprofessional, unacceptable and
potentially subject to reprimand or disciplinary procedures. The university
expects faculty and staff to:
-
Refrain from
taking any teaching, evaluative, advocacy, counseling, advising,
or supervisorial role involving an individual with whom he/she
is having an amorous or sexual relationship;
-
Remove himself/herself
from any teaching, evaluative, advocacy, counseling, advising,
or supervisorial role involving an individual with whom he/she
is having an amorous or sexual relationship.
-
Any supervisor
who is aware of a faculty or staff member who has a teaching,
evaluative, advocacy, counseling, advising, or supervisorial responsibility
for an individual with whom he/she is having an amorous or sexual
relationship shall take action to remove that individual from
his/her position of responsibility or otherwise resolve the problem.
-
A member of
the campus community who fails to withdraw from participation
in activities or decisions that may reward or penalize the party
with whom he/she is having a consensual relationship will be deemed
to have violated this policy.
It
is the responsibility of department chairs, deans, supervisors and managers
to take all necessary and appropriate steps, beginning with informal steps
to resolution, to prevent and correct problems stemming from amorous or
sexual relationships. If informal steps for resolution are unsuccessful,
the matter will be pursued via the formal corrective action or complaint
process listed in the sexual harassment complaint procedures.
It
is the responsibility of any member of the campus community who may be
uncertain about the propriety of consensual amorous or sexual relationships
to consult with campus personnel knowledgeable about professional standards,
ethical issues, and sexual harassment.
The
President shall take appropriate measures to ensure that:
-
This policy
is widely and frequently disseminated on campus, including among
students;
-
other appropriate
means of educating the community, such as periodic workshops,
are pursued.
-
It shall be
the responsibility of managers, supervisors, deans and department
chairs to ensure that employees or students under their direction
or supervision are informed of this policy.
Effective
date: September 19, 1994
Supersedes:
ASD 94-115
No
previous UPS
top
Hazing
Policy
California
State University, Fullerton expects that all members of all recognized
student organizations will observe and fully comply with the State of
California Education Code requirements on hazing. In addition, all students
are expected to adhere to regulations set forth by their respective national
organizations, IFC, Panhellenic and Black Greek Council and university
policies concerning practices commonly referred to as hazing. It is the
responsibility of the officers of student organizations to be informed
of all the above-mentioned regulations and to see that they are brought
to the attention of the rest of the membership.
Violations
of these regulations should be brought to the Vice President of Student
Affairs.
During
each Student Officer Orientation, coordinated by the Dean of Students
Office, this policy shall be reviewed, thereby educating all recognized
student organizations. Additionally, at the beginning of each semester,
the president of each social fraternity and sorority shall submit to the
Dean of Students Office, on a form provided by that office, a statement
signed by each elected officer of the organization attesting to the fact
that they have read and understand the information provided by the university
regarding hazing. The collecting of the officers signatures and
the submission of this form in a timely manner is the responsibility of
the president of each organization. Failure to submit this form by the
deadline established by the Dean of Students Office will result in suspension
of university recognition and a loss of campus privileges.
University
Policy
University
policy with respect to hazing prohibits any recognized student organization
from engaging collectively or individually in any of the following practices
as part of any program or general activity:
-
All forms
of physical activity not a part of an organized athletic contest
and not specifically directed toward constructive work is prohibited.
-
The application
of foreign substances to the body is prohibited.
-
Such activities
as a new member only scavenger hunts, new member ditches, kidnaps,
and the like are prohibited.
-
Any activity
which is mandatory for new members only, and is not educational
in nature is prohibited.
-
Depriving
students of sufficient sleep (6 hours per day minimum), decent
and edible meals, or access to means of maintaining bodily cleanliness
is prohibited.
-
Depriving
students of "sense awareness" (sight, sound, etc.) which
may cause mental and/or physical stress is prohibited.
-
Forcing, coercing
or permitting students to eat, or drink foreign or unusual substances
such as raw meat, salt water, onions, etc., is prohibited.
State
of California Education Code Section 32051
"No
student, or other person in attendance at any public, private, parochial,
or military school, community college, or other educational institution
shall conspire to engage in hazing, participate in hazing, or commit any
act that causes or is likely to cause bodily danger, physical harm, or
personal degradation or disgrace resulting in physical or mental harm
to any fellow student or person attending the institution.
The
violation of this section is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not
less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five thousand dollars
($5,000), or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year,
or both."
Allegations
of Hazing
Allegations
of violation of State law or university policies regarding hazing are
handled by the Vice President of Student Affairs. After assuring that
due process has been followed in determining the facts of a given case,
and that all parties involved have access to all of these facts, and that
the accused organization has an opportunity to face its accuser, the Vice
President of Student Affairs shall make a determination regarding the
apparent validity of the charge. If the organization indeed appears to
have violated State law or university policy, the Vice President may invoke
sanctions ranging from a warning to withdrawal of recognition. Decisions
of the Vice President may be appealed to the President of the university.
If
it appears to the Vice President of Student Affairs that the act of hazing
which was so serious as to endanger the life of the person or persons
who were hazed, the Vice President shall additionally refer the matter
to the Department of Public Safety.
top
|