![]()
|
ACADEMIC
SENATE MINUTES April 6,
2006 |
11:30
A.M. - 1:00 P.M. ACADEMIC
SENATE CHAMBERS
Members
Present: Alva, Bedell, Buck, Burgtorf, Dabirian, Drezner, Emry,
Fitch, Fromson, Gass, Gordon, Guerin, Hagan, Hall, Hassan, Hewitt, Holland, Jones, Junn, Kanel, Kantardjieff,
Kelly, Kirtman, Kreiner, Liverpool, Lovell, Matz, Meyer, Nanjundappa,
Pasternack, Pierson, Rhoten, Rumberger, Smith, Taylor, Vogt, Walicki, Williams
Absent: Fidalgo, Klassen, Klein, Michalopoulos, Napper,
Schroeder, Shapiro, Syed, Tavakolian
I.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bedell called the
meeting to order at 11:33 a.m.
II.
URGENT
BUSINESS
Senator Burgtorf reported on another case where a
faculty appointment offer was turned down due to issues with spousal hiring. He
asked if the Executive Committee has created an ad hoc committee to investigate
this or taken any other action to look into this issue. Chair Bedell replied
that the Executive Committee will address this at its next meeting or the
following meeting.
III.
ANNOUNCMENTS
Senator Nanjundappa:
·
CFA Fullerton
Chapter survey entitled “Quality of CSU Fullerton as a Workplace for Faculty”
will be distributed to faculty soon.
·
Salary data:
2006-2007 CPEC salary gap estimated at 18%, an increase from 15.2% (2005-2006).
For full professors, the CPEC gap is almost 20%, it is 13% for both associate
and assistant professors.
Chair Bedell announced that the survey on academic
quality will be going out next Thursday. He will report on the results in May.
Senator Meyer announced that Don Finn is retiring.
He will direct his last play production tomorrow night.
Senator Buck reported that the University Club has
reserved 50 seats for Cabaret in the new theatre on Mother’s Day, May 14th,
2:00 p.m. The 50 seats are being held until April 24th. Dinner at a restaurant
will follow (location TBA).
Dean Klammer provided an update on AL Flores’
condition. Chair Bedell asked that everyone keep him and his family in their
thoughts and prayers.
Senator Matz:
·
CSUF Debate
Team’s Brenda Montes will be featured on College Sports TV. She was awarded
fourth speaker distinction, the best finish of any sophomore in CSUF history.
·
Statewide Senate
Election: April 10 – 13
·
All
University Election: May 8 – 11
Senator Guerin reported
that the Senate Forum was distributed this week.
IV.
MINUTES
ASD 06-48 Academic Senate Meeting Minutes Draft
2-2-06 was approved as submitted.
V.
CHAIR’S REPORT
Chair Bedell reported that he attended a meeting
with the Pandemic Avian Flu Committee yesterday. It is expected that we will
see waves of this flu over the next two years. CSUF has a tentative plan in
preparation for the pandemic.
VI.
STATEWIDE
ACADEMIC SENATE REPORT
The Statewide Senators will attend interim
committee meetings tomorrow.
VII.
TIME CERTAIN
Time
Certain
12:15
p.m.
Subject:
Continuation of the Discussion of the Second Language Requirement
Chair Bedell asked Vice Chair Hall to assume
chair.
In response to the questions about the impact of
implementing this requirement, Senator Alva identified the three typical
patterns students (transferring from community colleges) follow to complete
general education requirements:
·
General
Education transfers A-E requirements (majority of students): Does not require
foreign language requirement
·
Lower
division transfer by major: going to become the preferred path to the CSU: This
is the statewide agreement as to how to fulfill the requirement. Does not
include the foreign language requirement
·
Requirement
of two years of high school or two college semesters of foreign language
Senator Alva shared a letter from an advisor at
It was
M/S [Bedell/Meyer] to approve resolution that calls for suspension of UPS
410.107 until sufficient data is gathered.
Senator
Nanjundappa: (friendly amendment)
(First
sentence): Add “implementation of” before “UPS 410.107…”
Lengthy discussion followed. The following
concerns were expressed:
In support of motion to approve resolution
·
Implementation
could have adverse effect on students who change their majors, students with
two majors (one major has requirement, and the other does not), or students who
change their degree within a major (i.e. change from B.A. program to B.F.A).
·
Students are
receiving incorrect information during academic advisement.
·
There is concern
about the articulation between CSUF and community colleges.
·
There is concern
that students who may meet the entrance requirement, but may not have used
language skills for years, may not do well in required language classes. In
effect, they would have to start over and take classes to prepare them for the
required classes.
·
If CSUF has a
3 semester language requirement and sister campuses and UC campuses do not, we
may face enrollment problems.
·
CSUF has not
done adequate analysis on the impact of the requirement.
·
Since
curriculum, courses, and challenge exams for the requirement have not been
approved, we are not ready to implement it.
·
Only three
colleges at CSUF have the requirement. There is concern about how that is
interpreted.
·
In the
·
Upper
division transfers are not required to provide high school transcripts for
admission. Therefore, we are unable to determine the preparedness of these
students, a group that makes up 2/3 of the student population. Since we are
number one in the state for transfer students, implementing the requirement now
is high risk.
·
CSUF received
27,500 first-time freshman applications. Of them, 14,000 were accepted, and 29%
or 1100-1200 would not be exempt from the requirement. Until they register for
classes this fall, we are unable to examine the incoming class.
·
This
resolution would allow time to interview students and determine what the
effects on the University would be.
Against the resolution:
·
Vague
language in resolution with regards to the ad hoc study group’s assignment.
·
Prolonging implementation
may result in the campus disregarding of the requirement.
·
The Modern
Languages department has stated that it is ready for implementation.
·
Suspending
implementation may further erode our relations with community colleagues.
It was
M/S [Guerin/Buck] to change the study groups’ Senate reporting dates (in
sections a. and b. of the resolution) from March 1, 2008 to February 15, 2007.
Discussion on this topic was not concluded due to
lack of time. It will resume at the next meeting.
VIII.
NEW BUSINESS
8.1 ASD 06-37 Civility Code [Bedell & Rhoten]
Senator
Nanjundappa (friendly amendment):
(Second
line of first paragraph): Add “and dissemination” after “the creation”
Senator
Burgtorf (friendly amendment):
(First
line of second paragraph): Change “civitas”
to “civilitas”
M/S/P
[Rhoten/Nanjundappa] to approve and affirm our commitment to this statement and
include it in any of our publication as a proclamation of our values. Approved
as amended; Passed with one abstention:
8.2 ASD
06-38 Revised UPS 330.231 Policy Regarding the Illegal Use of Drugs by Students
[SALC]
It was
M/S [Rhoten/Emry] to approve revised UPS 320.231 Policy Regarding the Illegal
Use of Drugs by Students.
Senator
Rhoten (friendly amendments):
·
(First
paragraph, lines 25-26) Delete “and” and place “…, and” behind “hallucinogens”.
Delete “including”.
·
(Second
paragraph, lines 35-36) Change the first sentence to “Student involvement in the manufacture, use, possession, distribution
or sale of illegal drugs or the misuse of any legal drugs is a matter of
concern to the University. Those behaviors may subject a student so involved to
disciplinary action by the University.”
Senator
Junn (friendly amendment):
·
(Second
paragraph, lines 35-36): Add “or other substances” after
“…the misuse of any legal drugs..”
With the
consent of the body, this document was referred back to the Student Academic
Life Committee with comments and the suggestion to include language that
addresses the legal use of marijuana and other substances. The SALC will be
asked to report to The Academic Senate in one week.
8.3 ASD
06-39 Revised UPS 300.021 Academic Dishonesty [SALC]
It was M/S
[Rhoten/Emry] to approve ASD 06-39 Revised UPS 300.021 Academic Dishonesty.
Senator Pasternack
(friendly amendment):
·
(Page 2, line
12): Add “offering or grading of the” before “final exam”
·
(Page 2, line
13): Replace “I” with “RP”
It was M/S [Hewitt/Fitch] to delete lines 42-44 (page 1).
Discussion on this UPS was ended when time certain
was reached but will resume at next week’s meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 1:03 p.m.