Overview for Lecturer Evaluators

UPS 210.070  defines the overall infrastructure for how evaluations for lecturer faculty are conducted including evaluation criteria and the steps in the review process workflow.

Some departments have   Department Standards for Lecturer FacultyOpens in new window   that have been approved by the Provost's office, which will provide the evaluation criteria for lecturer faculty in that specific department. Check to see if the department whose faculty you are evaluating have a set of approved standards before beginning your evaluation.

Changes to Review Process due to COVID-19

  • ALL Lecturer Evaluations are now conducted digitally through the Interfolio platform
    • This includes both Full-time & Part-time Lecturers
    • Rebuttal periods throughout the process are conducted through the Interfolio platform
    • All performance evaluation and rebuttal documentation are uploaded digitally to Interfolio, no more paper or emailed copies.
    • The   Lecturer Checklist   has been incorporated into the Interfolio Review packet, and will no longer be required as a separate document or upload.
  • FAR will no longer be creating binders for the Lecturer Evaluation process

Eligibility criteria for serving as a lecturer evaluator

UPS 210.070PDF File contains all of the details of Lecturer Evaluator Eligibility and Responsibilities (Section VII.B)

  • Untenured Faculty shall NOT serve on the Department Peer Review Committee
  • Any faculty members who are on any type of leave [sabbatical, DIP, etc.] during the semester when the evaluation cycle is occuring, cannot serve on the DPRC.
  • The department can request that FERP faculty teaching in both semesters run for election (please contact FAR for details)

Interfolio Tutorials

Evaluation Resources 

Templates of FAR Forms

upcoming events

FAR Calendar

 

Interflio login

Login

 

 

Review Type  Required Volume of Documentation to be submitted in the WPAF
Annual periodic 

  • In the first year of employment at CSUF, the faculty member must only submit 1 semester's worth of data documenting all academic and profesional activities

  • In all other annual reviews, the faculty members have to submit 1 year or 2 semester's  worth of data documenting all academic and profesional activities

Year 3 of 3 Periodic                       The faculty member must submit 2 1/2 years or 5 semesters worth of data documenting all academic and professional activities
6-year Comprehensive                                       The faculty member must submit 5 1/2 years or 11 semesters worth of data documenting all academic and professional activities 
Range Elevation The faculty member must submit 5 years or 10 semesters worth of data documenting all academic and professional activities